Feel Good Satanism

Well, maybe that’s going a little overboard, but I think the concept would make a funny commercial for sWitch if it was ever made into a film. And if it were, the Drive-In would be where it belonged. I’m not much for big, posh, multiplex theaters crowded with cardboard adverts and noisy arcades. I like to hear the projector or the crackle of a dangling speaker, not some idiot on a cell phone. And with your date in a tube top and a six-pack of Michelob in the trunk, what could be better? You could even hit the diner later and unscrew the salt shakers.

I’m not that huge a retro-fan – okay, I certainly am, but I like to think that I recognize the truly special in contemporary popular culture – but there seems to be a commercial agenda to broaden the cultural perspective so that the entire family can join in on the fun with their wallets. I’m always hearing that we’re “getting what we want”, so much so that I’m starting to wonder a) how they know what we want, and b) if they’re not just telling us what we want. To be honest, I want to know what you as a filmmaker/writer/artist wants and I want you to try and convince me of your point of view. In other words, not so much “here it is!” as “check it out!”. We’re so focused on raising the bottom line that very little is a surprise anymore. In the end, I suspect, we lower the standard for our imaginations. No wonder there’s so much attention being paid to remakes and retreads. How something from 50 years ago is still relevant has less to do with new effects and cultural signifiers than where we are now in terms of the human animal.

The story of The Ducharme family was, on the surface, a twisted and sexy romp that attempted to turn modern horror paradigms on its ear. Believe me, that sounds far more pretentious than it really is. I just wanted things to “switch” in the middle, and have the hunter sort of become the hunted and mess with our ideas of who is really the bad guy and so forth. If that’s enough for you, and I’m fine if it is, you can stop right here and enjoy the picture. The likes of which you, too, can make by going here. But if you’re in the mood for the real pretentious stuff, read on.

sWitch is my comment on the culture quandary caused by a commercialized, cookie-cutter caricature of the American Dream. I had grown tired of “feel good” narratives that propped up the wholesome brand while basically pretending that our darker instincts didn’t exist. The practice is the entertainment equivalent of a local beauty pageant. And with entertainment making enormous profits by raising our children these days, I believe we as a society addicted to entertaining ourselves are fixing them with overly simplified versions of what they should expect of their values, bodies, minds and the world. While I strongly believe there is room for low nuance and high sentiment in what we might dub mainstream recreation, fucking hell, have you seen an episode of America’s Got Talent, lately? Why can’t we mix family values with bold and truly creative expression of which diversity is not a challenge of otherness but intrinsic to our strength? Where’s our Adam’s Family, Hollywood?

At this point, there appears a stagnating divide that perpetrates a culture war within our own families. In essence, we’re at war with ourselves in modern American society and therefore we’re at war with everyone outside of it. We’re covering up, painting over, and sublimating our true nature –– a nature that is open to change in a variety of forms –– and the results are social and political constructs that support conflict, division and ill mental health (much of it organized under a rotting belief system).

I’m not trying to spur a revolution with rock and roll literature, and I actually believe that real cultural growth needs a balanced view of social propriety and experimentation. In fact, what fun would it be if there were no inherent conflicts in human social nature? It’s awesome to have a Bogeyman unite us, as long as we’re all clear on where he comes from and do our due diligence to determine what exactly is “real”. With sWitch I was definitely championing what I perceived to be cultural scapegoats and pariahs to try and make people examine their own personal beliefs and see if they recognize anything profoundly full of crap. And if they do, I would love to say to them, “Hey, it’s cool. Sometimes you need to play along to get along but let’s not confuse the matter further by giving up our connection to the earth and our own, natural born strengths”. I know that might sound like some lame Chicken Soup for the Soul definition of dark paganism, but if we’re bent on adhering to some saintly marketing concept that, under scrutiny, actually opposes togetherness and growth, I think it’s not only unhealthy, but ultimately fruitless, as well.

What I’m saying is, we don’t need to be afraid of who we are as human beings. What we should be afraid of is a lack of inward examination and self-exploration. We’re created to be comfortable with the dark as well as the light, with the earth and the stars and with sexuality and pleasure. It’s not wrong to lust, nor is it wrong to release our deepest desires through all forms of expression, as long as we’re not asking anyone else to adopt them. In nature, everyone is held accountable for their actions. There is no court of high appeals and no sociological “time outs”. Are we now too comfortable with a margin for error that is so easily filled with empty doctrine and self-serving spin? We’ve lost so much trust for ourselves, we’re creating hundreds of billions of walking powder kegs who are mourning the passing of self-respect in all kinds of weird and scary ways. And not “cool” weird and scary, more like “really” weird and scary. There’s a difference, folks.

Hey, I don’t give a damn how you look, what you drive, what kind of house you have, where your kids go to school (as long as they “teach” there), what kind of music you like, how much you “give” and what silly little bullshit you might have “lost” doing it. I give a damn about your humanity and understanding enough about what that means to wake up and accept that you might have a responsibility to keep working, growing and stay out of the way of real, evolutionary progress. In short, and perhaps in toto, sWitch sets out to be a wickedly fun way to hold you responsible for your connection to yourself as a human being and hold others responsible as well. I’m not even sure I succeeded in doing what I set out to do, and if some of the ideas turned you off, then consider yourself filtered. I’m okay with that. But you still have to ask yourself if you are doing enough to discover your own strengths and recognize your own real weaknesses, or are you expecting someone else’s marketing concept of who you should aspire to be dictate what’s right and wrong, and what’s appetizing and what isn’t?

It’d be swell if we stopped being afraid of who we really are, and more importantly, who we really could be. It requires a malleability of vision and the development of courage to accept what our experiments truly yield. Expectations are okay, just as long as you don’t expect anything but the truth.

About S. Norton

Writer, marketer, musician.
This entry was posted in sWitch and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Feel Good Satanism

  1. Jeanne says:

    Scott- traveled over to your site today while watching Texas beat Oklahoma (barely).

    Your story is very interesting. As are your thoughts about who we really are inside. Feel Good Satanism- that’s a term you don’t hear bandied about much.

    If you ever went to my blog you’d see I’m a participant in the rotting old religion. But, I still agree with you about many things. For one thing, there is great power in darkness. I totally believe that. I also believe there is great evil in the modern Church. And great, great evil in some of the Leaders who use their “faith” to get what they want, win, etc…

    I hate Church these days. I’ve been really outspoken about this in my life. I have a hard time dragging myself to Church. But, it has nothing to do with my actual faith in God. I have full faith in God and in “the light” as well as belief there is “dark” etc… One can’t exist without the other. To a certain extent, I think they crave each other. But, I think God has gotten lost in the modern Church. I think that it’s big business – and there is something very sinister about that. But, W.A.S.P. that I am, I can’t stop going altogether. I try to drown out what I hear there, and just think my own thoughts and pray my own prayers. I’m Episcopalian though- they don’t really care what you think or believe.

    But, about the darkness. Yes, it’s real, and hot, and sexy, and powerful, and very easy to get lost in. And if I’m going to read a book that has a romantic aspect, it needs a shot of darkness. There is nothing hot about two overt Christians – well- you know what I mean.

    But, I’m glad that a vast majority of the population keeps their minds closed and marches to the beat of the same, old drum. And the reason is- I don’t trust most of the population to have the intelligence or maturity to delve deeply into themselves, and evolve. I am terrified to think what a Pandora’s box that could be. I doubt many people have a deep, true love for, or comprehension of- dark, or light. Most people are followers, not experiencers (is that a word.):) But, if following works as a sort of strait jacket on the mass populus, then, good. You know? Good. Because it takes a great deal of depth, strength, maturity, and intelligence to go further. (I hope that makes sense.)

    Well, that’s probably all I should write for now. Sorry this comment was so long.
    I’m still interested in reading more.

  2. scottyus says:

    Hi Jeanne,

    No worries about the the long comment. One look at my post, and you have to wonder if I really needed 2,000 words to describe the concept of looking within for strength instead of without.

    I completely understand your reservations about the Pandora’s Box that exists in the heart of a great many unwashed. However, I think learning to draw strength from oneself rather than from a “higher power” can be learned, and that strength scares those who would use that higher power to control, as you also alluded to.

    What happens if we don’t become comfortable with the full range of the natural universe is we trap some truths somewhere that find their way out eventually anyway, and by then they’re far more dangerous. If we focus on one side, physical law dictates that we’ll be unbalanced. I think somewhere in there is where we get weak and afraid. I also think that lack of balance contributes to some of our more deadly diseases, but that’s another song for another time.

    My ideas have less to do with morality as they do with a general connection to ourselves and how we grow – which in essence, I feel, means truly learning about those things we’re afraid of rather than labeling them as “dark” or “evil”. There is affront to life and love in the world, no doubt, and my characters in sWitch run the gamut. In fact, it’s my “heroes” that are the ones who are trying to be something they’re not by striving for some identity that is actually tearing them apart. My “antagonists” draw them out in their own sick ways, but instead of saying that my heroes have reached their “heart of darkness”, I feel they’ve become “balanced”.

    I really am pleased you took the time to comment, Jeanne. I do enjoy hearing the point of view of someone who is an active member of the Episcopalian Church with which I have some experience as my sister was married into that faith. I was raised Roman Catholic, but from a very young age I never felt I was getting the whole story. There was too much hidden and far too much division. That never felt healthy or right.

    Anyway, I’ve gone on again. But thanks so much for visiting, reading and commenting so thoughtfully. Hopefully you’ll come back, and like I said, I’ll be letting everyone know when the book is ready. I’d be more than happy to send you a copy as my gift.

    Cheers, see you at Nathan’s blog, and enjoy the rest of your weekend.


  3. Jeanne says:

    So glad to come home from shopping with the kids to find that you’d replied. I feel lucky.

    Okay- I’m a labeler. And I get that you are saying something deeper that doesn’t apply to traditional labels. But, I do feel dark and feel light. Feel, not just think of them as labels- and that’s why I used those terms.

    I would love a copy of your book. Good luck. And I guess I’ll see you on Nate’s blog. I feel like I should stop dropping by there since I’m not a published author. I’d hate to annoy the authors with my lameness.

    And don’t dismiss the higher power thing completely.:) For me, God is inside me, not outside. But, that’s me.


  4. scottyus says:

    I’m pretty sure most of those who stop by Nathan’s blog are unpublished authors and those who love to read and perhaps are fascinated with the process of writing. I certainly am happy you responded to my pentagram cover comment, as well as other comments you and others who may not be writers have made. I think there’s something to take from everyone, and I’m very interested in what those who buy books have to say.

    And I do get what you’re saying about the “labels”. My concern for balance requires some redefining perhaps, but then we can’t discuss anything without labels of some kind. And there are many tenets of modern organized religion that I think are healthy such as forgiveness, and altruism, which I believe is something of a misnomer as reaching out to someone else improves things for everyone.

    I tell you, I’m more of an agnostic than an atheist. Until I can explain the origins of the universe down to the finest minutiae, I can’t be arrogant enough to declare that “that is all there is”. I do, however, believe that if there is a higher power, we don’t have the remotest idea of what it’s about outside of psychological instinct and a general sense of harmony. That’s why, when such a thing becomes explained in what I consider to be immature and melodramatic terms, I tend to shut off.

    So many of the world’s religions repeat a common pattern and have done since the beginning of man. My ideas about how they “help” us are more scientifically based, but as I said, I won’t claim to be the final authority on anything. But as you said, “inside” is where to start. However you make that contact is likely a good thing.

    Peace, back atcha.

  5. Jasmin says:

    what a pleasant surprise. a blogger who can actually write. :p

  6. scottyus says:

    Cheers, Jasmin. Thanks for dropping by. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s